Axver (axver) wrote,

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Vast sweeping generalisations for humorous effect

So, the following was just swirling through my head while I was trying - and failing - to come up with a good introduction to my Honours thesis. Why think of a good opening sentence when I can have some lulz about university instead?

Hierarchy amongst faculties

Based on observations of multiple Australian universities, from the top of the hierarchy to the very bottom.

1. Law: snobs, rich.
2. Medicine: not snobs, rich.
3. Science: snobs, not rich.
4. Arts: not snobs, not rich (too busy getting or recovering from hangovers).
5. Education: not snobs, not rich, not taken seriously.
6. Literary criticism: wankers.

Well, #6 isn't a faculty, but even Arts disowns it and lets it fall at the bottom of the heap.

Hierarchy within Arts

Too lazy to make this properly exhaustive.

1. History: self-important, actually do work.
2. Linguistics: not self-important, actually do work.
3. Political science: self-important, don't do much work.
4. Philosophy: self-important, don't do any work.
5. Theology: not self-important (when they remember to practise humility), don't have any work, often considered extinct.
6. Literary criticism: wankers.
Tags: university
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.