"I can see the marketing campaign now ...
Modern History - we invent the facts for you!
English - invent the facts yourself!"
It appealled to my sense of humour. Oh, and I finally pressured Sam into getting an LJ, tomb14. I'm an evil, evil man. Who needs to study German tonight. No-one capable of helping out in the grammar department? I hope I brought my (rather poor) textbooks home ...
Anyway. I've decided to succumb to the peer pressure.
Leave a comment with your name if you want to know what I really think of you, and I’ll reply and tell you. No lies, all honesty. Post it in your journal after I do yours so I can see the reverse.
Heck, tell me what you think of me while you're at it if you feel so inclined.
I can't be bothered doing the actual personality profile thing because I already know I'm an INTJ if there ever was one. I'm just stealing the description from screendoor3 and inserting my own comments.
To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive [So I have noticed], is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know. [I imagine a lot of you have been on the receiving end of that. I know my U2.]
INTJs are perfectionists [There is no compromise], with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms [Well, does it? And if it doesn't, what can be done about it?]. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.
INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability [It's sad that that's unusual]. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.
In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.
[I guess this is where I diverge from the INTJ norm. I do what I know, but I have absolutely no interest in the sciences or engineering. They bore me to tears and make my poor brain want to explode. Law did once hold an interest, and I guess academia is very much me, but I was quite interested to see they did not note journalism. And conformism? Ick, there's something to shy away from.]
Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.
[It is SO SCARY how true that is. When I read it, I just about screamed because it is so accurate. The self-confidence totally abandons me; I have little left beyond a nagging cynicism and negativity, despite the fact that I can care about some people incredibly deeply. In academic fields, nothing will hold me back, but if I have to go and talk to people ... suddenly I feel restricted and fearful. Oh, lovely indeed.]
This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals [Why would I even want to comprehend that pointless hoopla?]; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people [You better believe it], and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense [EXACTLY! EXACTLY! I can't emphasis that enough! MAKE SENSE!]. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naiveté, paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.
Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications. [I'd say that's extremely true. My closest friends have probably seen it in action. I'll work at something until it's in the state it should be, and I can always promise to at least try and understand, if not help.]
INTJs are idea people. Anything is possible; everything is negotiable. Whatever the outer circumstances, INTJs are ever perceiving inner pattern-forms and using real-world materials to operationalize them. Others may see what is and wonder why; INTJs see what might be and say "Why not?!" [Maybe they've just expressed it in a different way, but I see what might be and ask "How can it be done?" ... usually with the addition of "as quickly and cheaply as possible."] Paradoxes, antinomies, and other contradictory phenomena aptly express these intuitors' amusement at those whom they feel may be taking a particular view of reality too seriously. INTJs enjoy developing unique solutions to complex problems. [It intrigues me when people tell me I interpret situations uniquely and offer solutions to problems that they would not have realised. To me, they seem perfectly obvious.]
Thinking in this auxiliary role is a workhorse. Closure is the payoff for efforts expended. Evaluation begs diagnosis; product drives process. As they come to light, Thinking tends, protects, affirms and directs iNtuition's offspring, fully equipping them for fulfilling and useful lives. A faithful pedagogue, Thinking argues not so much on its own behalf, but in defense of its charges. And through this process these impressionable ideas take on the likeness of their master.
Feeling has a modest inner room, two doors down from the Most Imminent iNtuition. It doesn't get out much, but lends its influence on behalf of causes which are Good and Worthy and Humane. We may catch a glimpse of it in the unspoken attitude of good will, or the gracious smile or nod. Some question the existence of Feeling in this type, yet its unseen balance to Thinking is a cardinal dimension in the full measure of the INTJ's soul. [Some question its existence, but it is very much there beneath the surface. My exterior may be cold, but it doesn't reveal the full reality all the time.]
Sensing serves with a good will, or not at all. As other inferior functions, it has only a rudimentary awareness of context, amount or degree. Thus INTJs sweat the details or, at times, omit them. "I've made up my mind, don't confuse me with the facts" could well have been said by an INTJ on a mission [Though that may be me sometimes, some tests have actually picked up that I am close to the border of N and S, and I usually make up my mind AFTER I have confused myself with the facts and then resolved them]. Sensing's extraverted attitude is evident in this type's bent to savor sensations rather than to merely categorize them. Indiscretions of indulgence are likely an expression of the unconscious vengeance of the inferior.
Dan Aykroyd, actor (The Blues Brothers)
Susan B. Anthony, suffragist
Arthur Ashe, tennis champion
Augustus Caesar (Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus), Emperor of Rome
Jane Austen, author (Pride and Prejudice)
William J. Bennett, "drug czar"
William F. Buckley, Jr., conservative political advocate
Raymond Burr, actor (Perry Mason, Ironsides)
Chevy Chase (Cornelius Crane), actor (Fletch)
Phil Donahue, television talk show host
Michael Dukakis, governor of Mass., 1988 U.S. Dem. pres. candidate
Greg Gumbel, television sportscaster
Hannibal, Carthaginian military leader
Veronica Hamel, actor (Hill Street Blues)
Orel Leonard Hershiser, IV, major league baseball pitcher
Peter Jennings, television newscaster
Charles Everett Koop, former U.S. surgeon general
Ivan Lendl, tennis champion
C. S. Lewis, author (The Chronicles of Narnia) [One word: HURRAH! The second I started to see into his mind, I recognised he was extremely similar to me.]
Joan Lunden, television talk show host
Edwin Moses, U.S. olympian (hurdles)
Martina Navratilova, tennis champion
Charles Rangel, U. S. Representative, D-N.Y.
Pernell Roberts, actor (Bonanza)
Maria Owens Shriver, television newscaster
Josephine Tey (Elizabeth Mackintosh), mystery writer (Brat Farrar)
Rudy Giuliani, New York City mayor
Donald Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defense [Urgh.]
General Colin Powell, US Secretary of State [Urgh again.]
* Chester A. Arthur
* Calvin Coolidge
* Thomas Jefferson
* John F. Kennedy
* James K. Polk
* Woodrow Wilson
Cassius (Julius Caesar)
Mr. Darcy (Pride and Prejudice)
Gandalf the Grey (J. R. R. Tolkein's Middle Earth books) [I am most pleased.]
Hannibal Lecter (Silence of the Lambs) [Most pleased again. Hannibal Lecter is cultured, intelligent, articulate ... and, I suspect, a revelation of the dark side of the INTJ. Plus, Anthony Hopkins plays him to perfection.]
Professor Moriarty, Sherlock Holmes' nemesis
Ensign Ro (Star Trek--the Next Generation)
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (Hamlet)
George Smiley, John le Carre's master spy
Clarice Starling (Silence of the Lambs) [Another awesome fictional character. No complaints here.]
Hmm ... that's about the fourth time in a very short space of time that Silence Of The Lambs has quite randomly cropped up in a very short space of time. Let me say now that SOTL is one of the best movies ever made and I feel negligent because I have not watched it in ages. What a fantastic movie. If you haven't seen it yet, you should feel very disappointed in yourself. It is a masterpiece and a gem, and I have a hard time watching Anthony Hopkins in other movies because he took on the role of Hannibal Lecter so well. In SOR, it was so weird to watch a movie featuring him playing C. S. Lewis (an INTJ like Lecter, interestingly enough). I guess it's proof of Hopkins' amazing ability and broad talent that he is just as convincing as Lewis as he is as Lecter.
I think I should go do something productive now.