Contradiction is balance. [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Axver

[ website | U2gigs.com: for all your U2 setlist needs! (Got a question, suggestion, or addition? Feel free to leave me a comment! I co-maintain the site.) ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

A glorious day in Australian history [13 February 2008|09:44 pm]
[Tags|, , , , , , , , ]
[Current Music |'Beds Are Burning' by Midnight Oil]

Today will surely go down as one of the greatest days in Australian political history. As the first order of business of the 42nd parliament of Australia, Kevin Rudd offered an apology to the Stolen Generations, those thousands of Aboriginal children who were forcibly removed from their homes and made wards of the state, deprived of contact with their family and their culture. Rudd's speech was eloquent and moving; he acknowledged and apologised for the grave injustices of the past, went to great pains to reach out not only across racial lines to the Aborigines but also across ideological lines to all parts of the Australian community on this contentious issue, and laid the foundation of words upon which a structure of actions can be built to ensure a better future. It was only fitting that this apology was delivered by Rudd with Peter Garrett sitting prominently nearby as a fellow elected representative; as the lead singer of Midnight Oil, Garrett tirelessly brought awareness to the plight of the Aborigines and those of you who watched the 2000 Sydney Olympics Closing Ceremony likely remember him performing in black clothing emblazoned with the word "sorry". And today, Australia finally said sorry. I think the following are some of the best words I have ever heard any head of state speak:

"As Prime Minister of Australia, I am sorry. On behalf of the Government of Australia, I am sorry. On behalf of the Parliament of Australia, I am sorry. I offer you this apology without qualification."
- Kevin Rudd

I moved to Australia in 1997, the year Bringing Them Home was published. All I have known is John Howard's stubborn refusal to be a decent human being. In a sure reflection on just how petty, bigoted, and small this man really is, he was the only one of Australia's five living former Prime Ministers who was not in attendance. Four other Liberal MPs were conspicuously absent, while a fifth was so rude and disrespectful as to attend but read a magazine throughout the session and to refuse to stand in the otherwise unanimous show of support for the apology.

Brendan Nelson's pathetic attempt at a reply on behalf of the Opposition was truly a national embarrassment. He started well. He did what even three months ago I never thought I would hear a Liberal Party leader do: he offered support for Rudd's apology and said sorry himself. Then he just dug himself into a hole. His incohesive speech lacked a central theme; he dithered from point to point, inappropriately trying to score political points through mentioning the current Northern Territory intervention, irrelevantly and bafflingly mentioning Australians who died in combat, disgustingly asserting that we should feel no guilt for what has happened, and reprehensibly giving an impression of defending those who did the stealing for what he described as "good intentions". It was as if he was torn between his own bigotry and an irresistible future. It would have been political suicide to do anything other than support the apology, but he sure didn't go down without reminding us that racism and discrimination is alive and well in Australia. Although those in the parliament chamber rightly maintained the manners expected within there, those watching on the big screens outside and in other cities throughout the country quite understandably and justifiably booed Nelson, called "shame", turned their backs, and initiated a slow clap to drown out the disgraceful speech.

What Brendan Nelson and some people in Australian society (including, I am sad to say, a few individuals in journals and communities on my friends list) seem to fail to understand is that we do not exist in a historical vacuum. The consequences of the Stolen Generations live with us - some of those who were stolen are still alive, and their children are very much with us, living with the problems created by past injustices. The rest of us also live with the consequences - dealing with the past, as we exist within the context it created, and completing its unfinished business: that is, righting its wrongs. The first step to righting its wrongs is apologising for those wrongs. Nothing short of saying sorry is adequate.

I am a New Zealander first and foremost. Why, then, do I care? Because I am an Australian citizen. I have the certificate and the passport to prove it. I voted for this government, and I have been subject to the decisions of the Australian parliament for over a decade. Parliament functions within a political continuum - it has a responsibility to the past. Today's parliament exists within the historical context of past parliaments. The policies that created the Stolen Generations were in place during the lives of the majority of Australians. This lasted until the 1970s - it is, as has been emphasised, not ancient history. It is more than about time that this responsibility is acknowledged and an apology given. This apology is not saying that you, as an individual, are sorry for something you did not do - it is saying that we, as a community represented by a democratically elected parliament, are sorry for the wrongs that were done in our country's name to the oldest continuous civilisation on the planet. We exist in a historical context; we should be and are sorry for the wrongs contained within that context and are compelled by all that is good and decent to rectify the consequences of these injustices.

Also, as a New Zealander, I would like to take this opportunity to do something of my own, in the reconciliatory spirit of the day. The Maori people, like the Aborigines, have suffered injustices since Europeans colonised New Zealand. Their land was taken from them, by deception and by force. Their cultural values were ignored. Their language was marginalised. Therefore, I say the following. As the descendent of some of New Zealand's earliest settlers, as a New Zealander who exists within a historical context that contains shameful and inexcusable wrongdoings, and as a person capable of empathy, I am without qualification sorry to the Maori. As an aspiring historian of New Zealand, I can only hope that I may produce work that contributes to the historical record, informs the present and future, and does even the smallest of things to bring together the people of the most beautiful country on the planet in mutual understanding, respect, and equality.
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

[3 January 2008|09:17 pm]
[Tags|, , , , , , ]
[Current Music |'Together With The Seasons' by Sculptured]

Well, I hope everybody else has had a good start to their 2008. Mine has been fairly mundane so far. I've watched a good deal of cricket, returned to my writing, and read a fair bit. I've been feeding my addiction to 19th century Russian literature lately, but I don't want to overdo it. This morning, I finished Mikhail Lermontov's A Hero of Our Time, so now I'm moving on to some material from elsewhere before I pick up Leo Tolstoy's War And Peace. I'm currently reading Victor Hugo's Les Misérables and I'm thinking about starting Franz Kafka's The Trial. Hopefully I will get a lot of reading done this month. Summer's such a horrible season but it has one positive aspect in that it provides an incentive to stay inside, away from the bloody awful weather, and read in front of the fan.

I am, however, rather disappointed in New Zealand literature - or more to the point, the absence thereof. It would be pretty fair to say that the country hasn't exactly come close to producing a Fyodor Dostoevsky. Just trying to find a recognisable name beyond Katherine Mansfield seems like a mission. I can't say I'm surprised though; it's similar to what I have noticed in my academic field, New Zealand's socio-political history. Kiwi literature seems to be low in quantity, unremarkable in quality, and ignored by the rest of the world. Kiwi history is probably worse, truth be told. There are plenty of narrative or descriptive histories out there, often written by amateurs and retirees about their local region or particular field of interest - and many of them are fantastic and have a lot of character, but "verifiable references" seems to be a foreign concept. Academic works and analyses are sorely lacking, and many of those that exist are dreadful in quality and horribly out of date. Things have improved a bit recently, but I was let down by the brief treatment Neill Atkinson gave the female suffrage campaigners in Adventures in Democracy. Still, he did far better than older works, such as Airey and Condliffe's A Short History of New Zealand, an incredibly biased and poorly written work that I would not recommend to anybody who wishes to know anything about New Zealand.

While on the Gold Coast, I was both encouraged and discouraged by responses to my ambition to pursue New Zealand history academically as a career. I was asked multiple times "why are you doing that?", and on some occasions essentially dismissed with an "oh yeah, you're from New Zealand" (which isn't at all the reason). I suppose people expect me to do something more "important". Frankly, I think the world has more than enough dodgy historians of World War II, Germany, the US, etc. and such fields are overwhelmed. I feel sorry for someone with a genuine passion for World War II - how the hell are you meant to write about something original? There is so much work out there on so many aspects of the war from so many different perspectives that I really do wonder what's left; the "social health implications of World War II's impact on declines in carrot production in Australia in 1943" or something?

The New Zealand field, however, has huge deficiencies and gaps, as I stated above, and what's more, I believe it is very important to academic disciplines and relevant to the general person both within New Zealand and around the world. My trump card, of course, is the fact that New Zealand was the first country in the world to give women the vote, an incredibly forward-thinking decision and one that was not repeated elsewhere until Australia followed suit some nine years later. This bold move gave untold motivation to suffragists in the UK, US, and elsewhere, and the dodgy state of work on the matter has stunned me. The aforementioned Airey and Condliffe book dismisses the matter of female enfranchisement in under a paragraph of a 305 page book while dedicating three whole chapters to the Maori Wars of the 1860s. There's so much more than just that one matter too. New Zealand was the last country on earth to be settled and one of the last chapters in the British colonial experiment. Socially, it is one of the most progressive (not just in women's rights; it is worth noting that New Zealand is at the lead in the secularisation of society) and I think an analysis of the origins and development of this national progressivism would be of considerable worth. So while it is disheartening to repeatedly meet with disinterest and perplexed surprise, it also encourages me - I doubt I could make a difference, but it sure as hell motivatres me to try.
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

[7 December 2007|11:59 pm]
[Tags|, , , , ]
[Current Mood | tired]
[Current Music |'Red Ran Amber' by Pelican]

Well, I recently received my university results for the second semester. I think this is turning into "Axver's half-yearly justifiable bragging". So let's get that out of the way. )

Now I have 2.5 months to kill before the start of the next academic year. My aim is to stay productive and to keep producing work, even if it is not immediately useful. I'm sure I can still come across some ideas for LJ entries, at least! I need something to keep my brain occupied. Frankly, I feel that the lengthy summer break is too long. The month we get in winter is very nice, and the 1-2 week long mid-semester breaks are welcome relief. 2.5-3 months strikes me as overkill; I imagine that I am in a stark minority here though! But if I enjoy my work and research, then that is far more desirable than essentially killing time.

As it is, I'm already starting to think ahead to my thesis for my Honours year in 2009. I am increasingly coming to feel that I shall pursue the history of New Zealand. I have had my doubts. Is there demand? Is it worthwhile? Am I just pottering away about some place at the bottom of the world that most people only know for its rugby team? And that last question is partly what spurs me on to do it - there is so much more to New Zealand, and it has such a rich history that I think it demands more work. It certainly seems like academic analysis of Kiwi history is thin on the ground and much is yet to be done. I am starting to feel like there is a place for me. I am starting to feel like I have some ideas, perhaps not original ideas but overlooked and underexplored ideas. Whether they are a substantial contribution or not is, I suspect, something for others to judge. All I can do is to keep asserting the importance and relevance of New Zealand's historical legacy, both internally and externally. I suspect it boils down to the more general question of why history matters in the first place, and that is far too involved a topic for me to handle with my brain in its current tired state.

Have a good one, folks!
Link18 comments|Leave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]