Axver ([info]axver) wrote,
@ 2007-12-03 17:40:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current music:'Shattered Sky' by Psychotic Waltz
Entry tags:darfur, islam, religion, sudan

Insanity from Sudan
I thought I'd share my thoughts on one of the stories currently achieving prominence in the media.

I'm sure the majority of you will have heard of the Sudanese teddy bear blasphemy case. For those of you who haven't, here's a brief summary. A British teacher working in Sudan let her young students vote on the name of a class teddy bear. The winning name was that of a popular 7 year old, Muhammad, one of the world's most popular names and that of the Islamic prophet. This poor teacher suddenly found herself on the receiving end of a charge of insulting religion (!) and was sentenced to fifteen days' jail. Meanwhile, groups of Sudanese have protested this verdict as too lenient - yes, lenient, and they are demanding her execution. Yes, there are people in this world stupid enough to want somebody executed simply because of the name they permitted to be given to a teddy bear. Suddenly, the Danish cartoon controversy seems thoroughly sensible in comparison to this absolute lunacy.

Look, if you're so sensitive about your religion that you perceive an insult in a teddy bear's name, then maybe your personal faith is a flimsy piece of junk without a leg to stand on. I don't mean to say that the Islamic religion in general is a "flimsy piece of junk" (though I would contend it doesn't have a leg to stand on, like most institutionalised religion), but that the individuals who have a problem with this teddy bear's name have such a poor faith that they cannot defend it with logic, reason, or even subjective arguments/experiences, but have to employ the weight of legal institutions and the threat of death to maintain its power.

I must admit, I wonder how many of these people sincerely believe this women should die, and how many have just fallen victim to the propaganda of religious leaders who want to keep their population focused on everything but the real issues, or have been prompted to protest at the behest of a government they dare not disobey. This is Sudan, after all. In the west, Darfur is still in the throes of conflict, repression, and genocide with state support. In the south, tensions between Christians and Muslims have caused considerable bloodshed since the 1980s and currently have a shaky truce. Living conditions in general are horrible. There is so much wrong with this country, and the first thing they could do to fix things would be to overthrow the political and religious elite who have a vested interest in keeping it this way. But the elite aren't stupid, so a manufactured controversy like this conveniently keeps people occupied. Redirect their anger about poor living conditions, substandard education, and a miserable economy towards something that doesn't threaten the status quo but reinforces it.

This really is so incomprehensibly ridiculous. I am a typical leftie, I advocate respect for foreign cultures, and I will vigorously defend minorities in Australia who are accused of being insular, unassimilated and "un-Australian". But this isn't a matter of respecting culture. This is sheer stupidity, encouraged and manufactured by an elite because it suits them. It has precious little to do with religion as it should be practiced. I'm sure all intelligent Muslims with common sense do not think somebody should be prosecuted, let alone executed, for naming a teddy bear Muhammad (which, I repeat, was after a boy in the class, not the prophet, and why is the teacher being sentenced when the Sudanese children themselves - likely Muslims - chose the name?). In any case, an umbrella body representing British Muslim organisations has come out vehemently against the prosecution. And reports that get beyond what the Khartoum regime wants the media to see state that most of Sudan is quiet, free from protests, and not in favour of execution. But of course, those aspects aren't getting much air time. It's far easier for the media to focus on minorities: terrorist organisations, protestors burning embassies over cartoons, and people demanding execution because of a teddy bear's name. Islam's image really has taken a horrible hammering. I can't say I understand why somebody would grant intellectual assent to the claims of Islam, but they are fully entitled to have their beliefs and they should be able to practice them without an idiotic minority making them look like intolerant extremists, and certainly not a minority sponsored by a government.



(Post a new comment)


[info]miriamus
2007-12-03 07:49 am UTC (link)
To me it looks like somebody was looking for an excuse to pick on a non-Muslim, ANY non-Muslim and this was the first thing that came up.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]axver
2007-12-03 08:09 am UTC (link)
Yeah. I've done some reading and it seems like the Khartoum regime is desperate to divert attention from Darfur and stop peacekeepers going in. It had already objected to Scandinavians being in the peacekeeping force (because of the Danish cartoons, and as we all know, every person in Sweden personally approved the publication of the cartoons!). Now it's got this to completely redirect attention from the genocide it's supporting. This is all just a little too convenient.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ellytoad
2007-12-03 02:31 pm UTC (link)
It probably shows just how big of a rock I've been living under, but it surprised me to learn that Islam is a widely practiced religion in an African country. I thought it was just a Middle Eastern/Arab thing.

Anyway, the situation.... wow. What a crazy group of people. Wanting a woman's execution for naming a stuffed animal. They are calling this blasphemy. Which is weird, because if Muhammad is also the name of one of the woman's students, why isn't everyone going after the boy's parents as well?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]spaztick
2007-12-03 10:01 pm UTC (link)
What you said here made me think. I'm actually about to finish up a course on Islam.

Traditional Muslims are actually restricted to choosing certain names for their babies. They can choose from the names of martyrs, prophets, or names that have a meaning that expresses servitude or loyalty to Allah. Obviously, this includes Muhammad.

So are you just not allowed to name a stuffed animal? They obviously went after her for naming the bear after the Prophet, so we could probably safely assume had she named the bear after any other martyr or prophet, they would have gone after her for that, too. What else could she name it? Something not on the "approved" list? They probably would have gone after her then for using a "non-Allah-serving" name. This woman was damned any way she went. They were looking for a reason to start something.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]axver
2007-12-04 09:28 pm UTC (link)
'This woman was damned any way she went. They were looking for a reason to start something.'

That's what it seems to be. The Khartoum regime wanted a reason, any reason, to distract international attention from Darfur. This provided a convenient controversy, and look, the world's media flocked to it. However, I suspect it's backfiring as it's just put Sudan back in the headlines and this is so ridiculous that not even cultural relativists can viably defend it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]axver
2007-12-04 06:58 am UTC (link)
'It probably shows just how big of a rock I've been living under, but it surprised me to learn that Islam is a widely practiced religion in an African country. I thought it was just a Middle Eastern/Arab thing.'

Then you will probably be very surprised to learn that the largest Muslim country in terms of population is in fact Indonesia. Islam spreads all the way from Morocco in the west through North Africa to the Middle East, then across to western India, with a break for the Hindu/Buddhist areas before returning to prevalence in southeast Asia; it also extends up into the Balkans in Europe and parts of southern Russia. All the -stans in central Asia are Muslim countries.

'Which is weird, because if Muhammad is also the name of one of the woman's students, why isn't everyone going after the boy's parents as well?'

I can't say this with any certainty, which is why I didn't include it in my post, but I understnad Muhammad is the most popular name in the world, if I remember correctly some stats I saw a couple of years ago, and that's due entirely to its prevalence in Muslim states such as Sudan.

I understand the distinction that some have attempted to make is that naming a person Muhammad is in honour of the prophet and thus permissible, while something like a teddy bear trivialises Muhammad and is thus a mockery and an insult. Or something peculiar like that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]dysprosium
2007-12-03 09:36 pm UTC (link)
What an utterly absurd reason to wish death upon a fellow human being. When I first heard about this yesterday, I honestly thought it was something fabricated by The Onion.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]axver
2007-12-04 07:01 am UTC (link)
You're not the only one! I first thought it was an Onion story too until I watched the nightly news and also saw it on Wikipedia's In The News column, and I've seen similar "this isn't from The Onion?" comments by plenty of people on other forums.

And now you're going to assure me that you made your comment purely by superior mental abilities and were not at all breaking your Internet ban? ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]dysprosium
2007-12-04 05:33 pm UTC (link)
You'll probably find there are people at the Onion going, "Wow, why didn't we think of that one?" Ugh, all the more reason to hate organised religion. I still don't quite understand why it's blasphemy on the teacher's part to allow her students to name a stuffed toy after the prophet, when the children are the ones who suggested it in the first place. Yet another example of how the Westerner is always wrong and the Muslim is always right. I won't get into it right now, but I could tell you personal stories about Saudi Arabia that would make you shake your head in disbelief.

I can control my keyboard via telekinesis. ;) Meh, the Internet ban isn't going well. I'm like a nicotine addict swearing I'll smoke my last cigarette, only to be found puffing away five hours later.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]axver
2007-12-04 09:35 pm UTC (link)
Ha, yeah. Or perhaps the Onion folk will be saying "well, we thought of running a story just like this last year, but thought it was too mindnumbingly ridiculous even for us!" Apparently it's blasphemy because she let them give the bear the name ... or something. I get the feeling that trying to understand the reasoning is rather impossible. And certainly from what I've heard about Saudi Arabia, it's not exactly high on my "got to go there" list. It's probably only just ahead of Sudan! I think I'd rather travel to countries where, you know, women can drive and people aren't prosecuted for how they name a teddy bear.

I've learnt that any attempt on an Internet ban on my behalf is just pointless. I actually work worse, somehow. So I just revel in the addiction instead!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…